You will see the window looking something like this: Why is that happening?
The new accusation of Russian complicity in Malaysia Airlines shootdown Jit conclusion based on Ukrainian intelligence intercepts that were selectively interpreted while contrary information was ignored, writes Robert Parry.
By Robert Parry The key conclusion of the Dutch-led criminal inquiry implicating Russia in the shootdown of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 relied heavily on cryptic telephone intercepts that were supplied by the Ukrainian intelligence service and were given incriminating meaning not clearly supported by the words.
The investigators also seemed to ignore other intercepts that conflicted with their conclusions, including one conversation that appeared to be referring to a Ukrainian convoy, not one commanded by ethnic Russian rebels, that was closing in on the Luhansk airport, placing Ukrainian troops deep inside rebel territory.
Is it err… whatsit… Ukrops convoy?
The convoy that is going in the direction of the airport? And how did it go through? The Luhansk airport is about 20 miles south of the city center. In other words, if this intercept from JIT is correct, the Ukrainian military was operating near the highway routes that the alleged Russian Buk missile battery would have been using.
So, the convoy was confirmed. Where the convoy can be from? Fucking one and a half kilometres from the airdrome. Will now try to do something. Well, if they come in the airport, will fight at the airport.
What else can we do? H then bends north toward Luhansk airport and the city of Luhansk. A finding from the Dutch intelligence service, MIVD, released last October, said the only high-powered anti-aircraft missile systems in eastern Ukraine at that time, capable of bringing down MH at 33, feet and killing all people onboard, belonged to the Ukrainian military, not the rebels.
Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt published on Twitter in support of a claim about Russia placing BUK missiles in eastern Ukraine, except that the image appears to be an AP photo taken at an air show near Moscow two years earlier. That could be a Buk system but could apply to many other weapons systems as well.
That could be the case but other interpretations are possible. Yet, the SBU is far from a neutral party in the investigation, nor does it have clean hands regarding the Ukrainian civil war that followed a U.
Since then, the SBU has been on the front lines of crushing the rebellion by using controversial tactics. High Commissioner on Human Rights also continues to receive accounts about torture and ill-treatment, arbitrary and incommunicado detention by the SBU, especially in the conflict zone.
The JIT agreement gave Ukraine veto power over what would be released — even though Ukrainian military units were among the logical suspects in the MH case, Relying on Ukrainian Intelligence Earlier this year, an internal report describing the JIT operation revealed how dependent the investigators had become on information provided by the SBU.
But the JIT seemed oblivious to this conflict of interest, saying: Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko shakes hands with U.
Immediately after the crash, the SBU provided access to large numbers of tapped telephone conversations and other data. They share their questions with us and think along as much as they can. The investigating officers sort out this data and connect it to validate the reliability of the material.
The relative isolation of the Australian investigators further adds to their dependence on their Ukrainian hosts. The Dutch Safety Board report last October placed the spot of the suspected missile launch within a square-kilometer area, including both government and rebel positions.
According to the Dutch intelligence service finding also released last October, the only anti-aircraft missiles in eastern Ukraine on July 17,capable of hitting a plane flying at 33, feet belonged to the Ukrainian military.
Although Secretary of State John Kerry claimed to know the firing location immediately after the shootdown, the U. A source who was briefed by U. For its part, the Russian government has denied supplying the eastern Ukrainian rebels with a Buk system although the rebels did possess shorter-range, shoulder-fired MANPADs.One of the goals of a JIT system is a zero inventory, not only just in time but just enough.
Delivery is not made on the day it is needed but at the instant it is needed. In the care of patients the provider cannot accurately predict the exact products or volume of products that will be needed on a daily basis. After doing that, the JIT will start generating the optimized code, without redundant instructions: WinDbg.
WinDbg includes the most yunusemremert.com debugger available on Windows. , you can find much more detailed explanation in the Viewing JIT Dumps page on GitHub. Conclusion. JIT is powerful because it drives out unnecessary cost and helps detect problems that cause waste.
Jidoka is the response to problems. JIT is relatively easy to implement, but without the mechanisms of.
The baseline compiler is a method-based compiler and not a tracing JIT like for example LuaJIT. The purpose of the baseline compiler in Dora is to generate code as fast as possible, not to generate the most efficient code. The sooner it finishes code generation, the sooner execution can start. Inventory management can help business be more profitable by lowering their cost of goods sold and/or by increasing sales.
In a just-in-time (or JIT) production system, raw materials and parts are purchased or produced just in time to be used at each stage of the production process. Conclusion In any business, make it big or small, we. The JIT report claimed that the UK companies were loss making entities hence it was quite questionable how expensive properties were purchased with the business operations of these companies.