An analysis of the new approach to animal minds

You will find this and future installments conveniently gathered here. Some current philosophers have reasoned away the problem by positing that rocks have minds too. We are biological beings.

An analysis of the new approach to animal minds

This article was submitted to Frontiers in Comparative Psychology, a specialty of Frontiers in Psychology. Received Sep 15; Accepted Oct This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Comparative psychology is by nature an interdisciplinary science that lies at the crossroads of psychology and biology but also draws from other fields in the natural, social, and cognitive sciences.

The study of the psychology of animals has been labeled animal cognition, comparative cognition, animal learning, animal psychology, and animal intelligence.

Here, comparative psychology is used interchangeably with these terms, encompassing all fields that explore the psychological mechanisms underlying animal behavior, including human behavior.

The primary goal of comparative psychology is to understand the cognitive, emotional, and motivational processes of the animal mind.

How do other animals perceive, learn about, and make decisions in their worlds? From our pets to exotic animals portrayed in nature documentaries, we are inherently curious about other animals.

Comparative psychology both provides a window into their minds, as well as offers a unique perspective on the human mind.

Which aspects of our psychology do animals share?

An analysis of the new approach to animal minds

Human uniqueness is constantly challenged as we learn more about the psychology of animal minds. Once distinctive human abilities — such as tool use, language, and mental time travel — appear, at least to a degree, in other species.

Though other species exhibit elements of these abilities, the central question for comparing humans and animals remains, do humans and other animals share the same psychological mechanisms? Comparative psychology explores many of the same topics as human psychology.

From learning and memory to communication and decision making, the field investigates a number of key questions, for example: How do animals understand causal relationships in their environments? Can animals represent the perceptions, intentions, and beliefs of others? Do animals plan for the future?

Can animals use referential communication? How do animals track time and number? Do animals maintain a cognitive map of their environment? Do animals attend to the well being of others? How do animals categorize objects in their world?

Which emotional and motivational factors underly animal behavior? Studying the psychology of other species is not easy. With rare exceptions, we cannot ask directly about their psychological states. Instead, we must make inferences about the psychology of animals based on their behavior.

Inferring internal mechanisms from external behavior results in a number of challenges for comparative psychologists. Though we have met a number of these challenges, several remain, slowing our progress in advancing comparative psychology.

To push forward, we must meet these conceptual and practical challenges head on. The Complexity of Parsimony The difficulties of making inferences about internal mechanisms has spawned two general approaches to studying cognitive aspects of animal behavior. The animal learning approach emphasizes the general learning principles, such as instrumental, and Pavlovian conditioning, espoused by Hull, Spence, Tolman, and Skinner.

The cognitive approach examines other forms of cognition such as perception, attention, memory, categorization, navigation, timing, number, communication, decision making, and social cognition.

Though learning mechanisms often are considered simpler explanations, some cognitive mechanisms are more complex, requiring an organism to generate a mental representation.This approach is new to the study of animal cognition, as well as the study of human makes this approach powerful is that it then leads us to studies of the human brain.

We therefore begin to create an intimate connection between the thoughts and the neural-mechanisms that underlie them. tual analysis both in general and with respect to the topic of animal minds ). But it also argues for a type of conceptual analysis that is non-reductive and impure (Sections –).

This approach distinguishes the conceptual issues of philosophy from the factual issues of science, while Animal minds, philosophy, and. "Animal Minds": New blog exploring the neuroscience of animal behavior. neuroethological studies often begin with the analysis and categorization of an animal's behaviors in the field.

If the. In other words, the proximate approach tries to understand how animal minds work. The current view for cognitive neuroscientists is that the animal mind emerges from brain activity as the neural machinery encodes, manipulates, stores and recalls information, which is together called ‘ cognition.

SIMON P. JAMES. PHENOMENOLOGY AND THE PROBLEM OF ANIMAL MINDS. Environmental Values Environmental Values that the attempt to bridge the epistemological gap between a human mind.

SIMON P. JAMES. PHENOMENOLOGY AND THE PROBLEM OF ANIMAL MINDS. Environmental Values Environmental Values that the attempt to bridge the epistemological gap between a human mind.

How Can We Study the Evolution of Animal Minds?