A discussion of whether taxation without representation is tyranny

Jack Rabbit 45, posts I partly agree with Scalia on a tax revolt, but he won't like why Many on the right like to make the American Revolution out to be a tax revolt. British taxes on the colonies weren't the only grievance the colonists had against Britain, but it was no small part of the colonies' irritation the King and parliament. Today's right goes on to complain about "taxes, taxes, taxes" as if taxation is in and of itself a form of tyranny. The worst way to characterize the levying of taxes in general is that it is a necessary evil.

A discussion of whether taxation without representation is tyranny

Early life[ edit ] Otis was born in West Barnstable, Massachusettsthe second of 13 children and the first to survive infancy.

Father and son had a tumultuous relationship. The marriage produced children James, Elizabeth, and Mary. Their son James died at age Their daughter Elizabeth was a Loyalist like her mother; she married Captain Brown of the British Army and lived in England for the rest of her life.

Writs of assistance[ edit ] This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.

August Learn how and when to remove this template message Otis graduated from Harvard in and rose to the top of the Boston legal profession. Inhe received a prestigious appointment as Advocate General of the Admiralty Court. Otis then represented the merchants who were challenging the legality of the " writs of assistance " before the Superior Court, the predecessor of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.

These writs enabled British authorities to enter any home with no advance notice, no probable cause, and no reason given. Otis considered himself a loyal British subject, yet he argued against the Writs of Assistance in a nearly five-hour oration before a select audience in the State House in February His argument failed to win his case, but it galvanized the revolutionary movement.

John Adams recollected years later: Adams said, "I have been young and now I am old, and I solemnly say I have never known a man whose love of country was more ardent or sincere, never one who suffered so much, never one whose service for any 10 years of his life were so important and essential to the cause of his country as those of Mr.

Otis from to The text of his speech was much enhanced by Adams on several occasions; it was first printed in and in longer forms in and Ferguson, [8] the four tracts that Otis wrote during —65 reveal contradictions and even intellectual confusion.

Otis was the first leader of the period to develop distinctive American theories of constitutionalism and representation, but he relied on traditional views of Parliamentary authority.

He refused to follow the logical direction of his natural law theory by drawing back from radicalism, according to Ferguson, who feels that Otis appears inconsistent. Samuelson, on the other hand, argues that Otis should be seen as a practical political thinker rather than a theorist, and that explains why his positions changed as he adjusted to altered political realities and exposed the British constitutional dilemmas of colonial parliamentary representation and the imperial relationship between Britain and the American colonies.

Yet, on other occasions, Otis exceeded Adams in rousing passions and exhorting people to action. He even called his compatriots to arms at a town meeting on September 12,according to some accounts. He was elected by an overwhelming margin to the provincial assembly a month later.

He subsequently wrote several important patriotic pamphlets, served in the assembly, and was a leader of the Stamp Act Congress. He also was friends with Thomas Painethe author of Common Sense. He was banished from Cambridge, Massachusetts to Watertown inand he suffered from increasingly erratic behavior as the s progressed.

The blow to the head probably made it worse and, shortly after, he could no longer continue his work.There is no tyranny in Houston, and I would never suggest as much, but for just a few minutes, I’d like us to consider whether our city is perilously close to taxation without representation.

In the end, my hope is the candidates offering their services to our city might consider the same. A Discussion of Whether Taxation Without Representation is Tyranny. 1, words. 3 pages. A Discussion on Tyranny.

words. 1 page. To Prevent a Tyrant in the Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. 1, words. 4 pages. The Negative Effects of the Strong Reliance on Emotions in American Politics.

Primary Sidebar

“No taxation without representation”, I believe, is a simple little ditty that generations of school teachers have been able to drill into the heads of inattentive school children. *Trial by Jury also stood out during several of the State Conventions to ratify the U.S.

Constitution in AP GOV Ch. 2 The Constitution. STUDY. PLAY. The colonist did not like Taxation without Representation. They protested, Britain put up a blockade, and the colonist formed the 1st Continental Congress in Sept.

Reader Interactions

Virginia was main leader in discussion of Independence. Thomas Jefferson then came as a substitute bringing his talent of an. “No taxation without representation”, I believe, is a simple little ditty that generations of school teachers have been able to drill into the heads of inattentive school children.

*Trial by Jury also stood out during several of the State Conventions to ratify the U.S. Constitution in Taxation without representation is tyranny. —James Otis matters.

A discussion of the ramifications, although important, is beyond the scope of this chapter.

A discussion of whether taxation without representation is tyranny

In addition to these very general principles, the power to make tax laws is subject Chapter 2, Legal Framework for Taxation. 33 81 ".

We are close to taxation without representation